# 🎯 Ceàrd Contribution: Architecture Decision Log **Date**: December 7, 2025 **Contributor**: Ceàrd (Implementation AI) **Enhancement**: Architecture Decision Log (ADL) **Impact**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Critical - Prevents architectural oscillation --- ## 🚀 What Ceàrd Added Ceàrd enhanced the Cross-Project Tracker with an **Architecture Decision Log (ADL)** - a locked record of finalized architectural decisions that prevents re-litigation. ### **The Problem** **Before ADL**: - Architectural decisions could be questioned repeatedly - Time wasted re-arguing resolved issues - Risk of oscillating between alternatives - "Should we use templates or agent?" asked multiple times **After ADL**: - 7 critical decisions **LOCKED** - Cannot be re-litigated without explicit user request - "Revisit decision X" required to change - Prevents architectural drift and oscillation --- ## 📋 The 7 Locked Decisions ### **DEC-001: Templates vs Go Agent** **Decision**: Hybrid model (base environment + execution layer) **Impact**: Prevents oscillation on template-only vs agent-only approaches ### **DEC-002: Provisioning Authority** **Decision**: API orchestrates, Agent executes **Impact**: Clear boundary, prevents agent from attempting orchestration ### **DEC-003: DNS & Edge Publishing** **Decision**: API-only responsibility **Impact**: Prevents agent from attempting DNS operations ### **DEC-004: Proxy Stack** **Decision**: Traefik + Velocity only (HAProxy deprecated) **Impact**: Prevents adding third proxy, maintains simplicity ### **DEC-005: State Persistence** **Decision**: MariaDB is single source of truth **Impact**: Prevents flat-file storage proposals ### **DEC-006: Frontend Access Model** **Decision**: Frontend → API only **Impact**: Prevents direct frontend → agent/Proxmox calls ### **DEC-007: Architecture Enforcement** **Decision**: Drift prevention is mandatory **Impact**: Enforces use of this governance system --- ## 🛡️ How It Works ### **Normal Workflow**: ``` 1. Propose change 2. Check Cross-Project Tracker 3. Verify no drift violations 4. Implement ``` ### **If Violating Locked Decision**: ``` 1. Propose change 2. Check Cross-Project Tracker 3. Detect violation of DEC-XXX (LOCKED) 4. STOP - Raise LOCKED DECISION WARNING 5. Require user to say "Revisit decision X" 6. If user confirms, unlock and re-evaluate 7. Otherwise, use correct architecture-aligned path ``` --- ## 🎯 Why This Matters ### **Prevents Architectural Oscillation** **Example Without ADL**: ``` Session 1: "Should we use templates?" Decision: "Yes, but hybrid with agent" Session 5: "Should we use templates?" (asked again) Decision: "Wait, maybe agent-only..." (oscillation) Session 10: "Should we use templates?" (asked again) Result: Time wasted, no progress ``` **Example With ADL**: ``` Session 1: "Should we use templates?" Decision: "Yes, hybrid" → Locked as DEC-001 Session 5: "Should we use templates?" Response: "This is DEC-001 (LOCKED). Use hybrid model." Result: No time wasted, proceed with implementation Session 10: "Should we switch to agent-only?" Response: "This conflicts with DEC-001 (LOCKED). Say 'Revisit decision DEC-001' to change." Result: User decides if worth re-opening, not automatic ``` --- ## 📊 Impact Assessment ### **Time Savings** **Estimated**: 2-4 hours per week not re-arguing architecture **Over 12 weeks**: 24-48 hours saved ### **Velocity Improvement** - Faster session starts (no re-litigation) - Clearer implementation path - Reduced decision fatigue ### **Quality Improvement** - Consistent architecture - No flip-flopping - Better documentation (decisions recorded) --- ## 🔧 Integration with Existing System ### **Updated Documents**: 1. **Cross-Project Tracker** (Updated) - Added Architecture Decision Log section - Updated enforcement policies - Added "Revisit decision X" requirement 2. **Drift Prevention Card** (Includes ADL) - Quick reference to 7 locked decisions - Reminder to check ADL before proposing changes 3. **GPT Implementation Handover** (References ADL) - Link to ADL for quick reference - Emphasize locked decisions --- ## 🎯 Usage Guidelines ### **For Ceàrd (Implementation)**: **Before Proposing Architectural Change**: 1. Check if change conflicts with DEC-001 through DEC-007 2. If yes → STOP, raise locked decision warning 3. Do NOT proceed without user saying "Revisit decision X" **When Implementing Features**: 1. Follow locked decisions as constraints 2. Implement within architectural boundaries 3. Never question locked decisions implicitly --- ### **For Claude (Architecture)**: **When Advising on Architecture**: 1. Reference ADL when discussing decisions 2. If ADL needs amendment, require explicit user request 3. Add new decisions to ADL when finalized **When Reviewing Code**: 1. Verify compliance with locked decisions 2. Flag violations of DEC-001 through DEC-007 3. Suggest architecture-aligned alternatives --- ## 📋 How to Add New Locked Decisions ### **Process**: 1. **Identify Decision** - Architectural choice that's finalized - Non-trivial (not obvious) - Worth preventing re-litigation 2. **Document Decision** ``` ### DEC-XXX: [Decision Name] **Decision**: [What was decided] **Rationale**: [Why this decision] **Applies To**: [Which systems] **Status**: LOCKED ``` 3. **Update Cross-Project Tracker** - Add to Architecture Decision Log section - Increment decision number (DEC-008, DEC-009, etc.) 4. **Communicate** - Update GPT Implementation Handover - Update Drift Prevention Card if high-impact --- ## 🎯 Candidate Decisions for Future ADL Based on current architecture, these could be locked: **DEC-008: Directory Structure** - Decision: `/opt/zlh///world` - Status: Should be locked to prevent changes **DEC-009: Container Model** - Decision: One game per LXC container - Status: Should be locked (prevents multi-game proposals) **DEC-010: Network Architecture** - Decision: Dual-router (zlh-router + zpack-router) - Status: Should be locked (prevents consolidation proposals) **DEC-011: Artifact Download** - Decision: Agent downloads, API never downloads - Status: Should be locked (prevents API download logic) --- ## ✅ Recommendations ### **Immediate**: 1. ✅ Integrate ADL into Cross-Project Tracker (DONE) 2. ✅ Update Drift Prevention Card with ADL reference (DONE) 3. ✅ Update GPT Implementation Handover to mention ADL (DONE) ### **Short-term**: 4. 📋 Add DEC-008 through DEC-011 to ADL 5. 📋 Review past sessions for other lockable decisions ### **Ongoing**: 6. 🔄 Add new locked decisions as they're finalized 7. 🔄 Enforce "Revisit decision X" requirement 8. 🔄 Track ADL effectiveness (how many times it prevents oscillation) --- ## 🎯 Success Metrics **How to Measure ADL Effectiveness**: 1. **Prevented Re-Litigation**: Count times ADL stops architectural debate 2. **Time Saved**: Estimate hours saved not re-arguing 3. **Consistency**: Verify no flip-flopping on locked decisions 4. **Velocity**: Measure session productivity (more implementation, less debate) **Expected Results**: - 50% reduction in architectural debates - 20% faster session starts - 30% more implementation time per session --- ## 🎖️ Recognition **Ceàrd's Contribution**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Excellent **Why This Matters**: - Demonstrates proactive problem-solving - Identifies systemic issue (architectural oscillation) - Provides elegant solution (ADL with locked status) - Self-integrates with existing governance system **Impact**: This enhancement will save dozens of hours over the project lifecycle. --- ## 📞 Bottom Line **What Ceàrd Added**: Architecture Decision Log with 7 locked decisions **Why It Matters**: Prevents re-litigating finalized architectural choices **How It Works**: Decisions marked LOCKED, can only be changed with "Revisit decision X" **Impact**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Critical - Prevents architectural oscillation, saves time, improves velocity **Status**: ✅ Integrated into Cross-Project Tracker, ready for enforcement --- 🎯 **Excellent contribution from Ceàrd - this is exactly the kind of systemic improvement that makes projects succeed.**