# Risks & Constraints ## AWS Non-Compete Constraint ### Current Situation **Non-compete with AWS exists** - specific timeline and details need clarification. ### Strategic Implications **What This Rules Out:** - ❌ Building services that directly compete with AWS IoT Core, SiteWise, Greengrass - ❌ Marketing as "AWS alternative" or "AWS replacement" - ❌ Offering managed services that replace AWS products - ❌ Using AWS infrastructure for customer workloads **What This ALLOWS:** - ✅ Consulting and integration services (helping customers USE AWS better) - ✅ Working with companies who DON'T use AWS (non-customers) - ✅ Edge-first architecture (complementary, not competitive) - ✅ Building on Azure, GCP, or on-premise infrastructure - ✅ Targeting niches AWS doesn't address well (data sovereignty, SMB market) ### Compliance Strategy **Positioning:** - "Edge-first industrial IoT partner" (NOT "cloud platform") - "OT/IT integration specialist" (NOT "AWS competitor") - "Data sovereignty and on-premise solutions" (DIFFERENT from cloud-first) **Customer Targeting:** - Focus on companies with data sovereignty concerns - Target AWS non-users (plenty in manufacturing) - Position as "on-ramp to cloud" not "cloud replacement" - Offer to integrate WITH AWS if customer wants (complementary) **Messaging to Avoid:** - "Cheaper than AWS" - "AWS alternative" - "Replace your AWS IoT infrastructure" - Any direct competitive language **Safe Messaging:** - "Edge-first architecture for data sovereignty" - "Works on-premise, integrates with cloud if desired" - "We bridge OT to IT, including AWS when appropriate" ### Timeline Considerations **Questions to Clarify:** 1. What is the exact non-compete expiration date? 2. Does consulting/integration violate the non-compete? 3. Are edge-first/on-premise solutions acceptable? 4. Can we help customers connect to AWS (integration)? **Strategic Options Based on Timeline:** **If expires in <12 months:** - Focus heavily on consulting (safe) - Build network and customer base - Plan platform launch post-expiration - Use consulting to fund infrastructure **If expires in 12-24 months:** - Start with consulting (safe) - Build edge-first platform (likely safe if positioned correctly) - Avoid any AWS competitive language - Launch premium features post-expiration **If expires in 24+ months:** - Edge-first platform is likely fine (different market) - Focus on data sovereignty/on-premise customers - Explicitly avoid AWS competitive positioning - Build moat before non-compete expires --- ## Market Risks ### Risk 1: Customer Acquisition Difficulty **Risk**: Can't find customers willing to pay. **Probability**: Low-Medium **Impact**: High (no revenue) **Mitigation:** - Start with personal network (13 years of contacts) - Pilot pricing ($10k) reduces barrier to entry - Multiple outreach channels (LinkedIn, ISA, referrals) - Consulting model allows flexible pricing - Can work part-time while employed (no income pressure) **Contingency:** - Extend pilot period (90 → 120 days) - Lower pilot pricing ($5k-8k) - Expand geographic reach (remote work) - Partner with system integrators (referrals) --- ### Risk 2: Project Scope Creep **Risk**: Projects take 2-3x longer than estimated, burning time and profit. **Probability**: Medium **Impact**: Medium (reduced hourly rate, delayed other projects) **Mitigation:** - Fixed scope in contract (specific deliverables) - "Out of scope" clause for additional work - Charge extra for scope changes - Start small (40-80 hour projects) - Time tracking to identify issues early **Contingency:** - Renegotiate scope mid-project - Charge T&M for additional work - Learn from experience, improve scoping --- ### Risk 3: Platform Technical Failures **Risk**: Multi-tenant platform has stability issues, data loss, or downtime. **Probability**: Medium (new platform) **Impact**: High (customer churn, reputation damage) **Mitigation:** - Start with 2-3 pilot customers (test thoroughly) - Automated backups (daily + offsite) - Monitoring and alerting (proactive) - Gradual rollout (don't scale too fast) - 99.5% uptime SLA (reasonable, achievable) **Contingency:** - 24-hour support commitment - Free month of service for outages >4 hours - Backup to customer premises (if needed) - Migrate to more stable infrastructure if needed --- ### Risk 4: Competition from Established Players **Risk**: Siemens, Rockwell, or others target SMB market with aggressive pricing. **Probability**: Low-Medium **Impact**: Medium (harder to compete) **Mitigation:** - Focus on speed (weeks vs months) - Stay nimble (can pivot faster) - Personal service (vs enterprise bureaucracy) - Edge-first positioning (different than cloud) - Build relationships (sticky customers) **Contingency:** - Differentiate further (AI features sooner) - Partner with them (reseller/referral) - Go deeper in vertical (specialize) - Geographic focus (local presence wins) --- ### Risk 5: Customer Churn **Risk**: Customers leave after 6-12 months. **Probability**: Medium **Impact**: Medium (recurring revenue loss) **Mitigation:** - Deliver value (measurable ROI) - Excellent support (fast response) - Continuous improvement (new features) - Annual contracts (reduce churn) - Regular check-ins (relationship building) **Contingency:** - Exit interviews (learn why) - Win-back campaigns - Improve product/service - Target higher LTV customers --- ## Operational Risks ### Risk 6: Solo Founder Burnout **Risk**: Working full-time + building venture leads to burnout. **Probability**: Medium-High **Impact**: High (health, business failure) **Mitigation:** - Set boundaries (nights/weekends only, initially) - Phase 1 is part-time friendly (consulting) - Automate early (reduce manual work) - Hire contractor at $15k/month MRR - Plan exit from full-time job at $30k MRR **Contingency:** - Take breaks (1 week off per quarter) - Reduce scope (focus on high-value activities) - Hire sooner (even at lower MRR) - Consider part-time job (vs full-time) --- ### Risk 7: Technical Debt Accumulation **Risk**: Moving fast creates messy code/infrastructure that's hard to maintain. **Probability**: High (expected in bootstrap) **Impact**: Medium (slower future development) **Mitigation:** - Document as you go (runbooks, architecture) - Refactor periodically (quarterly) - Use proven technologies (not bleeding edge) - Leverage existing expertise (LXC from ZLH) - Plan for refactoring in roadmap **Contingency:** - Allocate 20% time for tech debt - Hire contractor to clean up (when cashflow allows) - Pause new features to refactor --- ### Risk 8: Regulatory/Compliance Issues **Risk**: GDPR, HIPAA, or industry-specific compliance requirements. **Probability**: Low-Medium **Impact**: High (fines, lawsuits) **Mitigation:** - Avoid regulated industries initially (healthcare, finance) - Data sovereignty approach helps with GDPR - Consult lawyer before regulated customers - Insurance (E&O, cyber liability) - Contracts with limitation of liability **Contingency:** - Hire compliance consultant - Obtain necessary certifications (ISO 27001) - Partner with compliant platform (pass-through) --- ## Financial Risks ### Risk 9: Insufficient Capital **Risk**: Run out of money before reaching profitability. **Probability**: Low (bootstrap model) **Impact**: High (business failure) **Mitigation:** - Start with only $500 - Consulting generates cash quickly - Customer-funded platform development - Work part-time while employed - 3-month cash runway target **Contingency:** - Take on more consulting projects - Slow platform development - Personal loan ($5k-10k if needed) - Stay at full-time job longer --- ### Risk 10: Pricing Too Low **Risk**: Price too low to be profitable or attract wrong customers. **Probability**: Medium **Impact**: Medium (low margins, wrong market) **Mitigation:** - Research competitive pricing - Start higher, discount selectively - Value-based pricing (not cost-plus) - Regular price reviews (quarterly) - Test pricing with pilots **Contingency:** - Raise prices for new customers - Grandfather existing customers (temporarily) - Add premium features (justify higher prices) --- ### Risk 11: Payment Collection Issues **Risk**: Customers don't pay on time or at all. **Probability**: Low-Medium **Impact**: Medium (cash flow issues) **Mitigation:** - 50% deposit on all projects - Credit card on file for recurring - Net 15 payment terms (not net 30) - Automated payment reminders - Pause service for non-payment (after grace period) **Contingency:** - Collections agency (last resort) - Legal action (if >$10k) - Write off as bad debt (<$5k) - Tighten credit requirements --- ## People Risks ### Risk 12: Can't Find Good Contractors **Risk**: Hire contractor who doesn't work out. **Probability**: Medium **Impact**: Medium (wasted money, customer issues) **Mitigation:** - Start with part-time contractor (10-20 hours/week) - Trial period (30-60 days) - Clear expectations and metrics - Start with simple tasks (customer support) - Use Upwork/Fiverr initially (lower commitment) **Contingency:** - Fire quickly (if not working) - Try multiple contractors (find good fit) - Do work yourself temporarily - Adjust expectations (good > perfect) --- ### Risk 13: Key Person Dependency **Risk**: Business depends entirely on founder's knowledge/relationships. **Probability**: High (solo founder) **Impact**: High (business can't run without you) **Mitigation:** - Document everything (runbooks, processes) - Train contractors early - Standard operating procedures - Automated systems (reduce manual work) - Build team (hire full-time employees) **Contingency:** - If health/emergency: Pause new sales, maintain existing - Contractor can handle day-to-day - Sell business (if necessary) --- ## Strategic Risks ### Risk 14: Wrong Market Segment **Risk**: Targeting SMB manufacturers isn't viable; need enterprise. **Probability**: Low **Impact**: High (pivot required) **Mitigation:** - Validate with Phase 1 consulting - Multiple customer conversations (discovery) - Test pricing with pilots - Be willing to pivot **Contingency:** - Pivot to enterprise (need capital) - Pivot to different vertical (food/bev to automotive) - Pivot to pure consulting (no platform) - Partner with enterprise vendor (reseller) --- ### Risk 15: Technology Becomes Obsolete **Risk**: LXC, MQTT, InfluxDB become outdated; need to rebuild. **Probability**: Low (these are mature) **Impact**: Medium (need to refactor) **Mitigation:** - Use proven, mature technologies - Standard protocols (MQTT, OPC UA) - Containerized (easy to migrate) - Monitor technology trends - Plan for evolution (not revolution) **Contingency:** - Gradual migration (not big bang) - Containers make it easier - Customer data is portable --- ## Mitigation Summary ### High-Priority Mitigations (Do First) 1. **Clarify AWS non-compete** (impacts entire strategy) 2. **Start with consulting** (fast cash, low risk) 3. **Document processes** (reduce key person risk) 4. **50% deposits** (payment risk) 5. **Start small** (pilot customers, test thoroughly) ### Medium-Priority Mitigations (Do After Launch) 6. Automated backups and monitoring 7. Contractor hiring process 8. Regular price reviews 9. Customer success program 10. Technical debt allocation ### Low-Priority Mitigations (Do When Scaling) 11. Compliance certifications 12. Insurance (E&O, cyber) 13. Multi-server redundancy 14. Advanced automation --- ## Risk Acceptance ### Risks We Accept **Solo founder limitations**: Building slowly, hiring when cashflow allows **Technical debt**: Will refactor periodically, not trying to be perfect **Market uncertainty**: Willing to pivot if needed **Competition**: Can't compete on everything; focus on differentiation **Why**: These risks are inherent to bootstrapping and acceptable given the low capital requirements and fast validation approach. --- ## Decision Points ### Go/No-Go Criteria **End of Phase 1 (Month 3):** - [ ] Generated $20k+ revenue (consulting) - [ ] 2+ completed projects - [ ] 5+ warm prospects for Phase 2 - **Decision**: Proceed to Phase 2 or continue consulting only **End of Phase 2 (Month 9):** - [ ] $10k+ MRR achieved - [ ] 5+ monitoring customers - [ ] <10% churn rate - [ ] Platform stable (99%+ uptime) - **Decision**: Proceed to Phase 3 or stay at Phase 2 **End of Phase 3 (Month 18):** - [ ] $30k+ MRR achieved - [ ] 3+ premium customers - [ ] Contractor hired and productive - **Decision**: Continue scaling or consider exit options --- ## Insurance & Legal Protection ### Recommended Insurance (When Revenue Hits $100k) **Errors & Omissions (E&O):** - Coverage: $1M-2M - Protects: Professional mistakes, bad advice - Cost: $1k-3k/year **Cyber Liability:** - Coverage: $1M - Protects: Data breaches, cyber attacks - Cost: $1k-2k/year **General Liability:** - Coverage: $1M - Protects: General business operations - Cost: $500-1k/year **Total**: $2.5k-6k/year (affordable at scale) ### Contract Protection **Always Include:** - Scope of work (specific deliverables) - Payment terms (50% deposit, net 15) - Limitation of liability (cap at project value) - Warranty disclaimer (no guarantees) - Indemnification (customer indemnifies us) - Termination clause (either party can exit) **Lawyer Review**: Have lawyer review standard contract ($500-1k one-time) --- ## Contingency Plans ### Worst Case Scenarios **Scenario 1: Can't find any customers** - **Response**: Extend timeline, lower prices, expand geography, pivot to pure consulting **Scenario 2: Platform fails catastrophically** - **Response**: Restore from backups, migrate to new server, refund customers, rebuild trust **Scenario 3: AWS non-compete violation alleged** - **Response**: Consult lawyer immediately, potentially pivot positioning or pause business **Scenario 4: Major competitor enters SMB market** - **Response**: Differentiate faster (AI features), go deeper in vertical, partner with them **Scenario 5: Personal emergency (health, family)** - **Response**: Contractor handles day-to-day, pause new sales, maintain existing customers --- ## Monitoring & Review ### Risk Review Cadence **Monthly**: Financial risks (cash flow, collections) **Quarterly**: Operational risks (churn, technical debt) **Annually**: Strategic risks (market, competition) ### Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) **Financial:** - Cash runway <90 days - Collections >30 days overdue - Churn rate >15% **Operational:** - Platform uptime <99% - Response time >24 hours - Customer satisfaction <4/5 **Strategic:** - Customer acquisition cost increasing - LTV decreasing - New competitor launches **Action**: If any KRI triggered, immediately review and adjust. --- *Last Updated: December 2025*