Add business models analysis document

business-models.md

@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
+# Business Model Options
+
+## Overview
+
+This document evaluates all business model options considered for the industrial IoT venture, with analysis of viability, capital requirements, and strategic fit.
+
+---
+
+## Option 1: Integration Consulting ✅ RECOMMENDED (Phase 1)
+
+### Description
+Provide OT/IT integration consulting services to manufacturers on a project or hourly basis.
+
+### Services Offered
+- PLC programming for data export
+- Edge gateway setup (on customer hardware)
+- MQTT/OPC UA configuration
+- Grafana dashboard deployment
+- Cloud integration (AWS, Azure, GCP)
+- Training for customer teams
+
+### Revenue Model
+- **Hourly**: $150-200/hour
+- **Project-based**: $15k-40k per project (100-200 hours)
+- **Small retainer**: $2k-5k/month ongoing support
+
+### Economics
+**Capital Required**: $500
+- LLC filing: $100-300
+- Basic website: $0-200
+- Business cards/marketing: $50-100
+
+**Time to First Revenue**: 30-60 days
+
+**Year 1 Potential**: $100k-200k (5-10 projects)
+
+### Advantages
+✅ Fast to revenue (30 days possible)  
+✅ Minimal capital required  
+✅ Validates market demand  
+✅ Builds network and case studies  
+✅ Customer-funded (use their hardware)  
+✅ No infrastructure costs  
+✅ Flexible schedule (works around full-time job)
+
+### Disadvantages
+❌ Time-for-money (limited scaling)  
+❌ No recurring revenue  
+❌ Project-based lumpy cash flow  
+❌ Requires constant sales
+
+### Strategic Fit
+**Perfect for Phase 1**: Generates cash, validates demand, builds relationships for future platform customers.
+
+---
+
+## Option 2: Edge Monitoring Platform ✅ RECOMMENDED (Phase 2)
+
+### Description
+Multi-tenant edge monitoring platform hosted on GTHost dedicated servers using LXC containers.
+
+### Services Offered
+- MQTT broker per customer
+- InfluxDB time-series database
+- Grafana dashboards
+- Alert management
+- Remote monitoring and support
+- Data backup and retention
+
+### Revenue Model
+**Service Tiers:**
+| Tier | Price/Month | Features |
+|------|-------------|----------|
+| Basic | $1,500 | 10 sensors, 30 days retention |
+| Pro | $2,000 | 50 sensors, 90 days retention, mobile app |
+| Enterprise | $3,000+ | Unlimited sensors, 1 year retention, custom |
+
+**Setup Fee**: $5k-10k one-time
+
+### Economics
+**Infrastructure Costs:**
+- GTHost server (8 cores, 32GB, 1TB): $100-150/month
+- Capacity: 8-10 customers per server
+- Revenue per server: $12k-30k/month
+- **Gross margin**: 85-90%
+
+**Capital Required**: $1,000
+- First 2 months GTHost funded from consulting revenue
+- Development time: nights/weekends
+
+**Break-even**: 2-3 customers
+
+### Advantages
+✅ Recurring revenue (sticky)  
+✅ Highly scalable (multi-tenant)  
+✅ High margins (90%+)  
+✅ Leverages LXC expertise from ZLH  
+✅ Edge-first (no AWS conflict)  
+✅ Can add customers to existing infrastructure
+
+### Disadvantages
+❌ Requires infrastructure investment  
+❌ Technical complexity (multi-tenant)  
+❌ Support overhead  
+❌ Longer sales cycle than consulting
+
+### Strategic Fit
+**Perfect for Phase 2**: Transitions consulting customers to recurring revenue, builds platform moat.
+
+---
+
+## Option 3: Virtual PLC Management ⚠️ PHASE 2-3
+
+### Description
+Deploy and manage soft PLCs (CODESYS) on customer hardware or GTHost servers.
+
+### Services Offered
+- Soft PLC runtime deployment
+- Remote management and monitoring
+- PLC programming services
+- Backup and disaster recovery
+- Redundancy and failover
+
+### Revenue Model
+- **Setup**: $10k-30k one-time
+- **Monthly management**: $3k-8k/month per site
+- **Programming**: $150-200/hour as needed
+
+### Economics
+**Infrastructure:**
+- Runs on customer hardware OR
+- GTHost dedicated server: $150-300/month
+- 1-3 customers per server (if hosted)
+
+**Capital Required**: $2,000-5,000
+- Development and testing
+- Pilot deployment costs
+
+### Advantages
+✅ Higher revenue per customer  
+✅ Sticky (critical infrastructure)  
+✅ Differentiated offering  
+✅ Leverages controls expertise
+
+### Disadvantages
+❌ Higher liability (control systems)  
+❌ Longer sales cycle (6-12 months)  
+❌ Safety certification concerns  
+❌ More technical risk
+
+### Strategic Fit
+**Good for Phase 2-3**: Once platform proven, add premium control tier for select customers.
+
+---
+
+## Option 4: GPU-Powered AI/ML Services ✅ RECOMMENDED (Phase 3)
+
+### Description
+Add AI-powered features using NVIDIA GPUs for predictive maintenance and computer vision.
+
+### Services Offered
+- Predictive maintenance models
+- Anomaly detection
+- Computer vision quality inspection
+- Advanced analytics dashboards
+- Custom ML model development
+
+### Revenue Model
+**Premium Tiers:**
+| Tier | Price/Month | Features |
+|------|-------------|----------|
+| AI Basic | $4,000 | Predictive maintenance, 20 assets |
+| AI Pro | $6,000 | + Computer vision, 50 assets |
+| AI Enterprise | $8,000+ | Custom models, unlimited assets |
+
+**Setup Fee**: $10k-20k one-time (model development)
+
+### Economics
+**Infrastructure:**
+- GTHost server with Tesla P4: $350-450/month
+- Capacity: 3-5 premium customers
+- Revenue per server: $12k-40k/month
+- **Gross margin**: 85%+
+
+**Capital Required**: $5,000
+- GPU server + development time
+- Funded from Phase 2 profits
+
+### Advantages
+✅ Premium pricing (high margins)  
+✅ Differentiated (competitors can't match)  
+✅ Defensible moat  
+✅ High customer value  
+✅ Multiple upsell paths
+
+### Disadvantages
+❌ Requires GPU infrastructure  
+❌ More complex to build  
+❌ Longer sales cycle  
+❌ Need ML expertise (or partner)
+
+### Strategic Fit
+**Perfect for Phase 3**: Once monitoring platform established, add AI tier for differentiation and margin expansion.
+
+---
+
+## Option 5: Digital Twin / Virtual Commissioning ❌ NOT RECOMMENDED
+
+### Description
+Build comprehensive digital twins and virtual commissioning environments for manufacturers.
+
+### Why NOT Recommended
+❌ Extremely compute-intensive (high infrastructure costs)  
+❌ Long sales cycles ($50k-150k projects, 6-18 months)  
+❌ Competes with AWS Digital Twin services (non-compete risk)  
+❌ Requires team (can't do solo)  
+❌ Large enterprises only (SMB can't afford)  
+❌ Complex 3D/physics simulation (outside core expertise)
+
+### Alternative Approach
+**IF pursued (far future):**
+- Partner with simulation vendors
+- Focus on PLC testing environments (simpler)
+- Offer as premium add-on, not core service
+- Wait until Phase 3+ with team in place
+
+---
+
+## Option 6: Brownfield Retrofit Projects ✅ HYBRID OPPORTUNITY
+
+### Description
+Add sensors and connectivity to existing equipment through project-based work.
+
+### Services Offered
+- Wireless sensor installation (LoRaWAN, cellular)
+- Edge gateway setup
+- Data pipeline configuration
+- Integration with monitoring platform
+
+### Revenue Model
+- **Project-based**: $20k-50k per site
+- **Maintenance**: $500-2k/month per site
+
+### Economics
+**Capital Required**: ~$0 (use customer hardware)  
+**Project Duration**: 2-4 weeks  
+**Projects per Year**: 6-12 possible
+
+### Advantages
+✅ Complements both consulting and platform  
+✅ Natural upsell to monitoring service  
+✅ Uses customer hardware (no capex)  
+✅ Project-based cash injection
+
+### Disadvantages
+❌ Still time-for-money  
+❌ Requires travel to site  
+❌ Project-based (lumpy revenue)
+
+### Strategic Fit
+**Hybrid with Phases 1-2**: Use as project revenue to fund platform development, convert to monitoring customers.
+
+---
+
+## Rejected Options
+
+### MSP for General IT
+**Why NOT**: Already saturated market, no OT differentiation, commoditized pricing
+
+### Cloud Platform Builder
+**Why NOT**: Competes with AWS (non-compete violation), requires massive capital, too competitive
+
+### Hardware Sales
+**Why NOT**: Low margins, logistics complexity, not our expertise
+
+### Traditional System Integrator
+**Why NOT**: Project-only, doesn't leverage cloud expertise, mature competitive market
+
+---
+
+## Recommended Business Model (Hybrid 3-Phase)
+
+### Phase 1 (Months 1-3): Consulting First
+**Revenue Model**: Project + hourly  
+**Target**: $20k-45k in 90 days  
+**Purpose**: Cash flow, validation, network
+
+### Phase 2 (Months 4-9): Add Monitoring Platform
+**Revenue Model**: Setup fees + recurring subscriptions  
+**Target**: $10k-15k MRR  
+**Purpose**: Recurring revenue, platform moat
+
+### Phase 3 (Months 10-18): Premium AI Features
+**Revenue Model**: Premium subscriptions + consulting hybrid  
+**Target**: $35k+ MRR  
+**Purpose**: Differentiation, margin expansion
+
+---
+
+## Revenue Mix Evolution
+
+### Month 3 (Phase 1)
+- Consulting projects: 100%
+- Recurring: 0%
+- **Total**: $20k-45k/month
+
+### Month 9 (Phase 2)
+- Consulting projects: 50%
+- Recurring monitoring: 50%
+- **Total**: $20k-30k/month
+
+### Month 18 (Phase 3)
+- Consulting projects: 20%
+- Recurring basic: 40%
+- Recurring premium: 40%
+- **Total**: $35k-50k/month
+
+---
+
+## Critical Success Factors
+
+### What Makes This Work
+
+1. **Start with Cash Flow**: Consulting first = no runway stress
+2. **Customer-Funded Platform**: Their projects pay for infrastructure
+3. **Recurring Revenue Focus**: Transition to subscriptions ASAP
+4. **Edge-First Always**: Avoids AWS conflict, addresses data sovereignty
+5. **Multi-Tenant Architecture**: Scale efficiently with LXC expertise
+6. **Premium Tier Later**: Add GPU/AI only after base platform proven
+
+### What Would Make This Fail
+
+1. **Starting with platform**: No revenue, burning through capital
+2. **Competing with AWS directly**: Non-compete violation
+3. **Trying to do everything**: Scope creep, delayed launch
+4. **Ignoring consulting revenue**: Long path to profitability
+5. **Building before validating**: Wrong product-market fit
+
+---
+
+## Financial Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Year 1 Revenue | Gross Margin | Scalability | Capital Needed | Risk Level |
+|-------|----------------|--------------|-------------|----------------|------------|
+| **Consulting Only** | $100k-200k | 95% | Low | $500 | Low |
+| **Platform Only** | $50k-120k | 90% | High | $10k+ | High |
+| **Hybrid (Recommended)** | $150k-300k | 90% | High | $1,500 | Medium |
+| **Digital Twins** | $0-50k | 40% | Medium | $50k+ | Very High |
+| **General MSP** | $50k-150k | 60% | Medium | $5k | High |
+
+---
+
+## Next Steps
+
+See `recommended-approach.md` for detailed 3-phase execution plan.
+
+---
+
+*Last Updated: December 2025*