Add business models analysis document
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9965860f4
commit
add70ea652
359
business-models.md
Normal file
359
business-models.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
|
||||
# Business Model Options
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This document evaluates all business model options considered for the industrial IoT venture, with analysis of viability, capital requirements, and strategic fit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Option 1: Integration Consulting ✅ RECOMMENDED (Phase 1)
|
||||
|
||||
### Description
|
||||
Provide OT/IT integration consulting services to manufacturers on a project or hourly basis.
|
||||
|
||||
### Services Offered
|
||||
- PLC programming for data export
|
||||
- Edge gateway setup (on customer hardware)
|
||||
- MQTT/OPC UA configuration
|
||||
- Grafana dashboard deployment
|
||||
- Cloud integration (AWS, Azure, GCP)
|
||||
- Training for customer teams
|
||||
|
||||
### Revenue Model
|
||||
- **Hourly**: $150-200/hour
|
||||
- **Project-based**: $15k-40k per project (100-200 hours)
|
||||
- **Small retainer**: $2k-5k/month ongoing support
|
||||
|
||||
### Economics
|
||||
**Capital Required**: $500
|
||||
- LLC filing: $100-300
|
||||
- Basic website: $0-200
|
||||
- Business cards/marketing: $50-100
|
||||
|
||||
**Time to First Revenue**: 30-60 days
|
||||
|
||||
**Year 1 Potential**: $100k-200k (5-10 projects)
|
||||
|
||||
### Advantages
|
||||
✅ Fast to revenue (30 days possible)
|
||||
✅ Minimal capital required
|
||||
✅ Validates market demand
|
||||
✅ Builds network and case studies
|
||||
✅ Customer-funded (use their hardware)
|
||||
✅ No infrastructure costs
|
||||
✅ Flexible schedule (works around full-time job)
|
||||
|
||||
### Disadvantages
|
||||
❌ Time-for-money (limited scaling)
|
||||
❌ No recurring revenue
|
||||
❌ Project-based lumpy cash flow
|
||||
❌ Requires constant sales
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Fit
|
||||
**Perfect for Phase 1**: Generates cash, validates demand, builds relationships for future platform customers.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Option 2: Edge Monitoring Platform ✅ RECOMMENDED (Phase 2)
|
||||
|
||||
### Description
|
||||
Multi-tenant edge monitoring platform hosted on GTHost dedicated servers using LXC containers.
|
||||
|
||||
### Services Offered
|
||||
- MQTT broker per customer
|
||||
- InfluxDB time-series database
|
||||
- Grafana dashboards
|
||||
- Alert management
|
||||
- Remote monitoring and support
|
||||
- Data backup and retention
|
||||
|
||||
### Revenue Model
|
||||
**Service Tiers:**
|
||||
| Tier | Price/Month | Features |
|
||||
|------|-------------|----------|
|
||||
| Basic | $1,500 | 10 sensors, 30 days retention |
|
||||
| Pro | $2,000 | 50 sensors, 90 days retention, mobile app |
|
||||
| Enterprise | $3,000+ | Unlimited sensors, 1 year retention, custom |
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup Fee**: $5k-10k one-time
|
||||
|
||||
### Economics
|
||||
**Infrastructure Costs:**
|
||||
- GTHost server (8 cores, 32GB, 1TB): $100-150/month
|
||||
- Capacity: 8-10 customers per server
|
||||
- Revenue per server: $12k-30k/month
|
||||
- **Gross margin**: 85-90%
|
||||
|
||||
**Capital Required**: $1,000
|
||||
- First 2 months GTHost funded from consulting revenue
|
||||
- Development time: nights/weekends
|
||||
|
||||
**Break-even**: 2-3 customers
|
||||
|
||||
### Advantages
|
||||
✅ Recurring revenue (sticky)
|
||||
✅ Highly scalable (multi-tenant)
|
||||
✅ High margins (90%+)
|
||||
✅ Leverages LXC expertise from ZLH
|
||||
✅ Edge-first (no AWS conflict)
|
||||
✅ Can add customers to existing infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
### Disadvantages
|
||||
❌ Requires infrastructure investment
|
||||
❌ Technical complexity (multi-tenant)
|
||||
❌ Support overhead
|
||||
❌ Longer sales cycle than consulting
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Fit
|
||||
**Perfect for Phase 2**: Transitions consulting customers to recurring revenue, builds platform moat.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Option 3: Virtual PLC Management ⚠️ PHASE 2-3
|
||||
|
||||
### Description
|
||||
Deploy and manage soft PLCs (CODESYS) on customer hardware or GTHost servers.
|
||||
|
||||
### Services Offered
|
||||
- Soft PLC runtime deployment
|
||||
- Remote management and monitoring
|
||||
- PLC programming services
|
||||
- Backup and disaster recovery
|
||||
- Redundancy and failover
|
||||
|
||||
### Revenue Model
|
||||
- **Setup**: $10k-30k one-time
|
||||
- **Monthly management**: $3k-8k/month per site
|
||||
- **Programming**: $150-200/hour as needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Economics
|
||||
**Infrastructure:**
|
||||
- Runs on customer hardware OR
|
||||
- GTHost dedicated server: $150-300/month
|
||||
- 1-3 customers per server (if hosted)
|
||||
|
||||
**Capital Required**: $2,000-5,000
|
||||
- Development and testing
|
||||
- Pilot deployment costs
|
||||
|
||||
### Advantages
|
||||
✅ Higher revenue per customer
|
||||
✅ Sticky (critical infrastructure)
|
||||
✅ Differentiated offering
|
||||
✅ Leverages controls expertise
|
||||
|
||||
### Disadvantages
|
||||
❌ Higher liability (control systems)
|
||||
❌ Longer sales cycle (6-12 months)
|
||||
❌ Safety certification concerns
|
||||
❌ More technical risk
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Fit
|
||||
**Good for Phase 2-3**: Once platform proven, add premium control tier for select customers.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Option 4: GPU-Powered AI/ML Services ✅ RECOMMENDED (Phase 3)
|
||||
|
||||
### Description
|
||||
Add AI-powered features using NVIDIA GPUs for predictive maintenance and computer vision.
|
||||
|
||||
### Services Offered
|
||||
- Predictive maintenance models
|
||||
- Anomaly detection
|
||||
- Computer vision quality inspection
|
||||
- Advanced analytics dashboards
|
||||
- Custom ML model development
|
||||
|
||||
### Revenue Model
|
||||
**Premium Tiers:**
|
||||
| Tier | Price/Month | Features |
|
||||
|------|-------------|----------|
|
||||
| AI Basic | $4,000 | Predictive maintenance, 20 assets |
|
||||
| AI Pro | $6,000 | + Computer vision, 50 assets |
|
||||
| AI Enterprise | $8,000+ | Custom models, unlimited assets |
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup Fee**: $10k-20k one-time (model development)
|
||||
|
||||
### Economics
|
||||
**Infrastructure:**
|
||||
- GTHost server with Tesla P4: $350-450/month
|
||||
- Capacity: 3-5 premium customers
|
||||
- Revenue per server: $12k-40k/month
|
||||
- **Gross margin**: 85%+
|
||||
|
||||
**Capital Required**: $5,000
|
||||
- GPU server + development time
|
||||
- Funded from Phase 2 profits
|
||||
|
||||
### Advantages
|
||||
✅ Premium pricing (high margins)
|
||||
✅ Differentiated (competitors can't match)
|
||||
✅ Defensible moat
|
||||
✅ High customer value
|
||||
✅ Multiple upsell paths
|
||||
|
||||
### Disadvantages
|
||||
❌ Requires GPU infrastructure
|
||||
❌ More complex to build
|
||||
❌ Longer sales cycle
|
||||
❌ Need ML expertise (or partner)
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Fit
|
||||
**Perfect for Phase 3**: Once monitoring platform established, add AI tier for differentiation and margin expansion.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Option 5: Digital Twin / Virtual Commissioning ❌ NOT RECOMMENDED
|
||||
|
||||
### Description
|
||||
Build comprehensive digital twins and virtual commissioning environments for manufacturers.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why NOT Recommended
|
||||
❌ Extremely compute-intensive (high infrastructure costs)
|
||||
❌ Long sales cycles ($50k-150k projects, 6-18 months)
|
||||
❌ Competes with AWS Digital Twin services (non-compete risk)
|
||||
❌ Requires team (can't do solo)
|
||||
❌ Large enterprises only (SMB can't afford)
|
||||
❌ Complex 3D/physics simulation (outside core expertise)
|
||||
|
||||
### Alternative Approach
|
||||
**IF pursued (far future):**
|
||||
- Partner with simulation vendors
|
||||
- Focus on PLC testing environments (simpler)
|
||||
- Offer as premium add-on, not core service
|
||||
- Wait until Phase 3+ with team in place
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Option 6: Brownfield Retrofit Projects ✅ HYBRID OPPORTUNITY
|
||||
|
||||
### Description
|
||||
Add sensors and connectivity to existing equipment through project-based work.
|
||||
|
||||
### Services Offered
|
||||
- Wireless sensor installation (LoRaWAN, cellular)
|
||||
- Edge gateway setup
|
||||
- Data pipeline configuration
|
||||
- Integration with monitoring platform
|
||||
|
||||
### Revenue Model
|
||||
- **Project-based**: $20k-50k per site
|
||||
- **Maintenance**: $500-2k/month per site
|
||||
|
||||
### Economics
|
||||
**Capital Required**: ~$0 (use customer hardware)
|
||||
**Project Duration**: 2-4 weeks
|
||||
**Projects per Year**: 6-12 possible
|
||||
|
||||
### Advantages
|
||||
✅ Complements both consulting and platform
|
||||
✅ Natural upsell to monitoring service
|
||||
✅ Uses customer hardware (no capex)
|
||||
✅ Project-based cash injection
|
||||
|
||||
### Disadvantages
|
||||
❌ Still time-for-money
|
||||
❌ Requires travel to site
|
||||
❌ Project-based (lumpy revenue)
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Fit
|
||||
**Hybrid with Phases 1-2**: Use as project revenue to fund platform development, convert to monitoring customers.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Rejected Options
|
||||
|
||||
### MSP for General IT
|
||||
**Why NOT**: Already saturated market, no OT differentiation, commoditized pricing
|
||||
|
||||
### Cloud Platform Builder
|
||||
**Why NOT**: Competes with AWS (non-compete violation), requires massive capital, too competitive
|
||||
|
||||
### Hardware Sales
|
||||
**Why NOT**: Low margins, logistics complexity, not our expertise
|
||||
|
||||
### Traditional System Integrator
|
||||
**Why NOT**: Project-only, doesn't leverage cloud expertise, mature competitive market
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended Business Model (Hybrid 3-Phase)
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1 (Months 1-3): Consulting First
|
||||
**Revenue Model**: Project + hourly
|
||||
**Target**: $20k-45k in 90 days
|
||||
**Purpose**: Cash flow, validation, network
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2 (Months 4-9): Add Monitoring Platform
|
||||
**Revenue Model**: Setup fees + recurring subscriptions
|
||||
**Target**: $10k-15k MRR
|
||||
**Purpose**: Recurring revenue, platform moat
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3 (Months 10-18): Premium AI Features
|
||||
**Revenue Model**: Premium subscriptions + consulting hybrid
|
||||
**Target**: $35k+ MRR
|
||||
**Purpose**: Differentiation, margin expansion
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Revenue Mix Evolution
|
||||
|
||||
### Month 3 (Phase 1)
|
||||
- Consulting projects: 100%
|
||||
- Recurring: 0%
|
||||
- **Total**: $20k-45k/month
|
||||
|
||||
### Month 9 (Phase 2)
|
||||
- Consulting projects: 50%
|
||||
- Recurring monitoring: 50%
|
||||
- **Total**: $20k-30k/month
|
||||
|
||||
### Month 18 (Phase 3)
|
||||
- Consulting projects: 20%
|
||||
- Recurring basic: 40%
|
||||
- Recurring premium: 40%
|
||||
- **Total**: $35k-50k/month
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Success Factors
|
||||
|
||||
### What Makes This Work
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Start with Cash Flow**: Consulting first = no runway stress
|
||||
2. **Customer-Funded Platform**: Their projects pay for infrastructure
|
||||
3. **Recurring Revenue Focus**: Transition to subscriptions ASAP
|
||||
4. **Edge-First Always**: Avoids AWS conflict, addresses data sovereignty
|
||||
5. **Multi-Tenant Architecture**: Scale efficiently with LXC expertise
|
||||
6. **Premium Tier Later**: Add GPU/AI only after base platform proven
|
||||
|
||||
### What Would Make This Fail
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Starting with platform**: No revenue, burning through capital
|
||||
2. **Competing with AWS directly**: Non-compete violation
|
||||
3. **Trying to do everything**: Scope creep, delayed launch
|
||||
4. **Ignoring consulting revenue**: Long path to profitability
|
||||
5. **Building before validating**: Wrong product-market fit
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Financial Model Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
| Model | Year 1 Revenue | Gross Margin | Scalability | Capital Needed | Risk Level |
|
||||
|-------|----------------|--------------|-------------|----------------|------------|
|
||||
| **Consulting Only** | $100k-200k | 95% | Low | $500 | Low |
|
||||
| **Platform Only** | $50k-120k | 90% | High | $10k+ | High |
|
||||
| **Hybrid (Recommended)** | $150k-300k | 90% | High | $1,500 | Medium |
|
||||
| **Digital Twins** | $0-50k | 40% | Medium | $50k+ | Very High |
|
||||
| **General MSP** | $50k-150k | 60% | Medium | $5k | High |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
See `recommended-approach.md` for detailed 3-phase execution plan.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Last Updated: December 2025*
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user