knowledge-base/ZeroLagHub_ADL_Contribution_Summary.md

298 lines
8.1 KiB
Markdown

# 🎯 Ceàrd Contribution: Architecture Decision Log
**Date**: December 7, 2025
**Contributor**: Ceàrd (Implementation AI)
**Enhancement**: Architecture Decision Log (ADL)
**Impact**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Critical - Prevents architectural oscillation
---
## 🚀 What Ceàrd Added
Ceàrd enhanced the Cross-Project Tracker with an **Architecture Decision Log (ADL)** - a locked record of finalized architectural decisions that prevents re-litigation.
### **The Problem**
**Before ADL**:
- Architectural decisions could be questioned repeatedly
- Time wasted re-arguing resolved issues
- Risk of oscillating between alternatives
- "Should we use templates or agent?" asked multiple times
**After ADL**:
- 7 critical decisions **LOCKED**
- Cannot be re-litigated without explicit user request
- "Revisit decision X" required to change
- Prevents architectural drift and oscillation
---
## 📋 The 7 Locked Decisions
### **DEC-001: Templates vs Go Agent**
**Decision**: Hybrid model (base environment + execution layer)
**Impact**: Prevents oscillation on template-only vs agent-only approaches
### **DEC-002: Provisioning Authority**
**Decision**: API orchestrates, Agent executes
**Impact**: Clear boundary, prevents agent from attempting orchestration
### **DEC-003: DNS & Edge Publishing**
**Decision**: API-only responsibility
**Impact**: Prevents agent from attempting DNS operations
### **DEC-004: Proxy Stack**
**Decision**: Traefik + Velocity only (HAProxy deprecated)
**Impact**: Prevents adding third proxy, maintains simplicity
### **DEC-005: State Persistence**
**Decision**: MariaDB is single source of truth
**Impact**: Prevents flat-file storage proposals
### **DEC-006: Frontend Access Model**
**Decision**: Frontend → API only
**Impact**: Prevents direct frontend → agent/Proxmox calls
### **DEC-007: Architecture Enforcement**
**Decision**: Drift prevention is mandatory
**Impact**: Enforces use of this governance system
---
## 🛡️ How It Works
### **Normal Workflow**:
```
1. Propose change
2. Check Cross-Project Tracker
3. Verify no drift violations
4. Implement
```
### **If Violating Locked Decision**:
```
1. Propose change
2. Check Cross-Project Tracker
3. Detect violation of DEC-XXX (LOCKED)
4. STOP - Raise LOCKED DECISION WARNING
5. Require user to say "Revisit decision X"
6. If user confirms, unlock and re-evaluate
7. Otherwise, use correct architecture-aligned path
```
---
## 🎯 Why This Matters
### **Prevents Architectural Oscillation**
**Example Without ADL**:
```
Session 1: "Should we use templates?"
Decision: "Yes, but hybrid with agent"
Session 5: "Should we use templates?" (asked again)
Decision: "Wait, maybe agent-only..." (oscillation)
Session 10: "Should we use templates?" (asked again)
Result: Time wasted, no progress
```
**Example With ADL**:
```
Session 1: "Should we use templates?"
Decision: "Yes, hybrid" → Locked as DEC-001
Session 5: "Should we use templates?"
Response: "This is DEC-001 (LOCKED). Use hybrid model."
Result: No time wasted, proceed with implementation
Session 10: "Should we switch to agent-only?"
Response: "This conflicts with DEC-001 (LOCKED).
Say 'Revisit decision DEC-001' to change."
Result: User decides if worth re-opening, not automatic
```
---
## 📊 Impact Assessment
### **Time Savings**
**Estimated**: 2-4 hours per week not re-arguing architecture
**Over 12 weeks**: 24-48 hours saved
### **Velocity Improvement**
- Faster session starts (no re-litigation)
- Clearer implementation path
- Reduced decision fatigue
### **Quality Improvement**
- Consistent architecture
- No flip-flopping
- Better documentation (decisions recorded)
---
## 🔧 Integration with Existing System
### **Updated Documents**:
1. **Cross-Project Tracker** (Updated)
- Added Architecture Decision Log section
- Updated enforcement policies
- Added "Revisit decision X" requirement
2. **Drift Prevention Card** (Includes ADL)
- Quick reference to 7 locked decisions
- Reminder to check ADL before proposing changes
3. **GPT Implementation Handover** (References ADL)
- Link to ADL for quick reference
- Emphasize locked decisions
---
## 🎯 Usage Guidelines
### **For Ceàrd (Implementation)**:
**Before Proposing Architectural Change**:
1. Check if change conflicts with DEC-001 through DEC-007
2. If yes → STOP, raise locked decision warning
3. Do NOT proceed without user saying "Revisit decision X"
**When Implementing Features**:
1. Follow locked decisions as constraints
2. Implement within architectural boundaries
3. Never question locked decisions implicitly
---
### **For Claude (Architecture)**:
**When Advising on Architecture**:
1. Reference ADL when discussing decisions
2. If ADL needs amendment, require explicit user request
3. Add new decisions to ADL when finalized
**When Reviewing Code**:
1. Verify compliance with locked decisions
2. Flag violations of DEC-001 through DEC-007
3. Suggest architecture-aligned alternatives
---
## 📋 How to Add New Locked Decisions
### **Process**:
1. **Identify Decision**
- Architectural choice that's finalized
- Non-trivial (not obvious)
- Worth preventing re-litigation
2. **Document Decision**
```
### DEC-XXX: [Decision Name]
**Decision**: [What was decided]
**Rationale**: [Why this decision]
**Applies To**: [Which systems]
**Status**: LOCKED
```
3. **Update Cross-Project Tracker**
- Add to Architecture Decision Log section
- Increment decision number (DEC-008, DEC-009, etc.)
4. **Communicate**
- Update GPT Implementation Handover
- Update Drift Prevention Card if high-impact
---
## 🎯 Candidate Decisions for Future ADL
Based on current architecture, these could be locked:
**DEC-008: Directory Structure**
- Decision: `/opt/zlh/<game>/<variant>/world`
- Status: Should be locked to prevent changes
**DEC-009: Container Model**
- Decision: One game per LXC container
- Status: Should be locked (prevents multi-game proposals)
**DEC-010: Network Architecture**
- Decision: Dual-router (zlh-router + zpack-router)
- Status: Should be locked (prevents consolidation proposals)
**DEC-011: Artifact Download**
- Decision: Agent downloads, API never downloads
- Status: Should be locked (prevents API download logic)
---
## ✅ Recommendations
### **Immediate**:
1. ✅ Integrate ADL into Cross-Project Tracker (DONE)
2. ✅ Update Drift Prevention Card with ADL reference (DONE)
3. ✅ Update GPT Implementation Handover to mention ADL (DONE)
### **Short-term**:
4. 📋 Add DEC-008 through DEC-011 to ADL
5. 📋 Review past sessions for other lockable decisions
### **Ongoing**:
6. 🔄 Add new locked decisions as they're finalized
7. 🔄 Enforce "Revisit decision X" requirement
8. 🔄 Track ADL effectiveness (how many times it prevents oscillation)
---
## 🎯 Success Metrics
**How to Measure ADL Effectiveness**:
1. **Prevented Re-Litigation**: Count times ADL stops architectural debate
2. **Time Saved**: Estimate hours saved not re-arguing
3. **Consistency**: Verify no flip-flopping on locked decisions
4. **Velocity**: Measure session productivity (more implementation, less debate)
**Expected Results**:
- 50% reduction in architectural debates
- 20% faster session starts
- 30% more implementation time per session
---
## 🎖️ Recognition
**Ceàrd's Contribution**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Excellent
**Why This Matters**:
- Demonstrates proactive problem-solving
- Identifies systemic issue (architectural oscillation)
- Provides elegant solution (ADL with locked status)
- Self-integrates with existing governance system
**Impact**: This enhancement will save dozens of hours over the project lifecycle.
---
## 📞 Bottom Line
**What Ceàrd Added**: Architecture Decision Log with 7 locked decisions
**Why It Matters**: Prevents re-litigating finalized architectural choices
**How It Works**: Decisions marked LOCKED, can only be changed with "Revisit decision X"
**Impact**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Critical - Prevents architectural oscillation, saves time, improves velocity
**Status**: ✅ Integrated into Cross-Project Tracker, ready for enforcement
---
🎯 **Excellent contribution from Ceàrd - this is exactly the kind of systemic improvement that makes projects succeed.**